Brief Report: Risk of Recurrent Interstitial Lung Disease From Osimertinib Versus Erlotinib Rechallenge After Symptomatic Osimertinib-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease.

Introduction: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most frequent cause of drug-related mortality from EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Yet, for patients with symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD, the risk of recurrent ILD associated with EGFR TKI rechallenge, either with osimertinib or another TKI, such as erlotinib, is unclear. Methods: Retrospective study of 913 patients who received osimertinib treatment for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Clinical characteristics, ILD treatment history, and subsequent anticancer therapy of patients with symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD were collated. The primary end point was to compare the incidence of recurrent ILD with osimertinib versus erlotinib rechallenge. Results: Of 913 patients, 35 (3.8%) had symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD, of which 12 (34%), 15 (43%), and eight (23%) had grade 2, 3 to 4, and 5 ILD, respectively. On ILD recovery, 17 patients had EGFR TKI rechallenge with eight received osimertinib and nine received erlotinib. The risk of recurrent ILD was higher with osimertinib rechallenge than erlotinib (p = 0.0498). Of eight, five (63%) developed recurrent ILD on osimertinib rechallenge, including three patients with fatal outcomes. In contrast, only one of nine patients (11%) treated with erlotinib had recurrent ILD. Median time to second ILD occurrence was 4.7 (range 0.7-12) weeks. Median time-to-treatment failure of patients with erlotinib rechallenge was 13.2 months (95% confidence interval: 8.6-15.0). Conclusions: The risk of recurrent ILD was considerably higher with osimertinib rechallenge than erlotinib. Osimertinib rechallenge should be avoided, whereas erlotinib may be considered in patients with symptomatic osimertinib-induced ILD.

A novel approach to evaluation of tumor response for advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma using the intertumoral heterogeneity response score.

Treatment response and prognosis estimation in advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma are challenged by the significant heterogeneity of the disease. The current Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, despite providing a basis for solid tumor response evaluation, do not fully encompass this heterogeneity. To better represent these nuances, we introduce the intertumoral heterogeneity response score (THRscore), a measure built upon and expanding the RECIST criteria. This retrospective study included patients with 3-10 measurable advanced lung adenocarcinoma lesions who underwent first-line chemotherapy or targeted therapy. The THRscore, derived from the coefficient of variation in size for each measurable tumor before and 4-6 weeks posttreatment, unveiled a correlation with patient outcomes. Specifically, a high THRscore was associated with shorter progression-free survival, lower tumor response rate, and a higher tumor mutation burden. These associations were further validated in an external cohort, confirming THRscore's effectiveness in stratifying patients based on progression risk and treatment response, and enhancing the utility of RECIST in capturing complex tumor behaviors in lung adenocarcinoma. These findings affirm the promise of THRscore as an enhanced tool for tumor response assessment in advanced lung adenocarcinoma, extending the RECIST criteria's utility.

Inflamed immune phenotype predicts favorable clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy across multiple cancer types.

BACKGROUND: The inflamed immune phenotype (IIP), defined by enrichment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) within intratumoral areas, is a promising tumor-agnostic biomarker of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. However, it is challenging to define the IIP in an objective and reproducible manner during manual histopathologic examination. Here, we investigate artificial intelligence (AI)-based immune phenotypes capable of predicting ICI clinical outcomes in multiple solid tumor types. METHODS: Lunit SCOPE IO is a deep learning model which determines the immune phenotype of the tumor microenvironment based on TIL analysis. We evaluated the correlation between the IIP and ICI treatment outcomes in terms of objective response rates (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in a cohort of 1,806 ICI-treated patients representing over 27 solid tumor types retrospectively collected from multiple institutions. RESULTS: We observed an overall IIP prevalence of 35.2% and significantly more favorable ORRs (26.3% vs 15.8%), PFS (median 5.3 vs 3.1 months, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.76), and OS (median 25.3 vs 13.6 months, HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.75) after ICI therapy in IIP compared with non-IIP patients, respectively (p<0.001 for all comparisons). On subgroup analysis, the IIP was generally prognostic of favorable PFS across major patient subgroups, with the exception of the microsatellite unstable/mismatch repair deficient subgroup. CONCLUSION: The AI-based IIP may represent a practical, affordable, clinically actionable, and tumor-agnostic biomarker prognostic of ICI therapy response across diverse tumor types.

Allelic Context of EGFR C797X-Mutant Lung Cancer Defines Four Subtypes With Heterogeneous Genomic Landscape and Distinct Clinical Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: EGFR C797X (C797S or C797G) mutation is the most frequent on-target mechanism of resistance to osimertinib. The hypothesis that the allelic context of C797X/T790M has implications for treatment is on the basis of sporadic reports and needs validation with larger cohorts. METHODS: We identified patients with EGFR C797X-mutant NSCLC from nine centers who progressed on osimertinib, all analyzed in a single laboratory through next-generation sequencing. We analyzed genomic profiles and assessed associations between clinical outcomes and C797X status. RESULTS: A total of 365 EGFR C797X-mutant cases were categorized into four subtypes on the basis of allelic context: in cis (75.3%), in trans (6.4%), cis&trans (10.4%), and C797X-only (7.9%). Genomically, the cis&trans subtype displayed the highest frequency of concurrent alterations at osimertinib resistance sites (21.1%), while the in cis subtype had the lowest (8.4%). Clinically, cis&trans patients exhibited the worst progression-free survival (PFS) on both previous (median 7.7 mo) and subsequent treatment (median 1.0 mo) and overall survival (median 3.9 mo). In subsequent treatments, in cis patients exhibited superior PFS with combined brigatinib and cetuximab (median 11.0 mo) compared with other regimens (p = 0.005), while in trans patients exhibited variable outcomes with combined first or second- and third-generation EGFR inhibitor (PFS range: 0.7-8.1 mo, median 2.6 mo). Notably, subtype switching was observed after subsequent treatments, predominantly toward the in cis subtype. CONCLUSIONS: Allelic context could define four EGFR C797X-mutant NSCLC subtypes with heterogeneous genetic landscapes and distinct clinical outcomes. Subsequent treatments further complicate the scenario through subtype switching.

Concomitant electromagnetic navigation transbronchial microwave ablation of multiple lung nodules is safe, time-saving, and cost-effective.

Objectives: Transbronchial microwave ablation of lung nodules using electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy is an emerging local therapy for lung oligometastases and multifocal lung cancers as part of a lung-preserving strategy. Concomitant ablation of multiple lung nodules in a single operating session may provide a one-stop solution. Methods: Between April 2019 and April 2023, 25 patients had 2 or more lung nodules ablated concomitantly in our hybrid operating room. Nodules were proven or highly suspicious of malignancies or metastases. Feasibility and safety were retrospectively reviewed. Results: A total of 56 nodules in 25 patients received concomitant multi-nodular ablation. The mean age of patients was 60 years, and the reasons for the lung-preserving strategy were multifocal lung cancers (80%) and lung oligometastases (20%). Among those with multifocal disease, 65% had previous major lung resection for lung cancer. Two to 4 nodules were ablated in each session. The mean nodule size was 9.9 mm (range, 5-20 mm), and the mean minimal margin was 5.9 mm. When comparing concomitant nodule ablation with the 103 single-nodule ablations performed in our institute, a mean of 86 minutes of operative time and 131 minutes of anesthetic time were saved. There were no increased complications despite overlapping ablation zones, and the mean hospital stay was 1.23 days. The rate of pneumothorax was 8%, and that of pleural effusion, pain, and fever was 4% respectively. Conclusions: Concomitant transbronchial microwave ablation of multiple lung nodules is feasible, safe, and associated with reduction in overall anesthetic and operative time. It is an important armamentarium in the contemporary lung-preserving strategy for battling multifocal lung cancers or lung oligometastases.

Clinical and molecular characterization of long-term survivors with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer treated with first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide.

OBJECTIVES: In the Phase I/III IMpower133 study, first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide (CP/ET) treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival versus placebo plus CP/ET. We explored patient and disease characteristics associated with long-term survival in IMpower133, and associations of differential gene expression and SCLC-A (ASCL1-driven), SCLC-N (NEUROD1-driven), SCLC-P (POU2F3-driven), and SCLC-inflamed (SCLC-I) transcriptional subtypes with long-term survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated ES-SCLC were randomized 1:1 to four 21-day cycles of CP/ET with atezolizumab or placebo. Long-term survivors (LTS) were defined as patients who lived ≥ 18 months post randomization. A generalized linear model was used to evaluate the odds of living ≥ 18 months. Differential gene expression was analyzed using RNA-sequencing data in LTS and non-LTS. OS was assessed by T-effector and B-cell gene signature expression. Distribution of SCLC transcriptional subtypes was assessed in LTS and non-LTS. RESULTS: More LTS were in the atezolizumab arm (34%) than in the placebo arm (20%). The odds ratio for living ≥ 18 months in the atezolizumab arm versus the placebo arm was 2.1 (P < 0.03). Enhanced immune-related signaling was seen in LTS in both arms. Exploratory OS analyses showed atezolizumab treatment benefit versus placebo across T-effector and B-cell gene signature expression subgroups. A higher proportion of LTS than non-LTS in both arms had the SCLC-I subtype; this difference was particularly pronounced in the atezolizumab arm. CONCLUSION: These exploratory analyses suggest that long-term survival is more likely with atezolizumab than placebo in ES-SCLC, confirming the treatment benefit of the IMpower133 regimen. CLINICALTRIAL: gov Identifier: NCT02763579.

A Phase II Study of Osimertinib in Patients with Advanced-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer following Prior Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (EGFR TKI) Therapy with EGFR and T790M Mutations Detected in Plasma Circulating Tumour DNA (PLASMA Study).

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutations drive resistance in 50% of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progress on first/second generation (1G/2G) EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and are sensitive to Osimertinib. Tissue sampling is the gold-standard modality of T790M testing, but it is invasive. We evaluated the efficacy of Osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC and T790M in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). PLASMA is a prospective, open-label, multicentre single-arm Phase II study. Patients with advanced NSCLC harbouring sensitizing EGFR and T790M mutations in plasma at progression from ≥one 1G/2G TKI were treated with 80 mg of Osimertinib daily until progression. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR); the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and toxicities. Plasma next-generation sequencing was performed to determine Osimertinib resistance mechanisms and assess serial ctDNA. A total of 110 patients from eight centres in five countries were enrolled from 2017 to 2019. The median follow-up duration was 2.64 (IQR 2.44-3.12) years. The ORR was 50.9% (95% CI 41.2-60.6) and the DCR was 84.5% (95% CI 76.4-90.7). Median PFS was 7.4 (95% CI 6.0-9.3) months; median OS was 1.63 (95% CI 1.35-2.16) years. Of all of the patients, 76% had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), most commonly paronychia (22.7%); 11% experienced ≥ Grade 3 TRAEs. The ctDNA baseline load and dynamics were prognostic. Osimertinib is active in NSCLC harbouring sensitizing EGFR and T790M mutations in ctDNA testing post 1G/2G TKIs.

Developments in targeted therapy & immunotherapy-how non-small cell lung cancer management will change in the next decade: a narrative review.

Background and Objective: The adoption of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has revolutionised the treatment landscape of non-small cell lung cancer. For early staged disease, incorporation of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has recently been demonstrated to reduce recurrence. Development of targeted therapies in advanced lung cancer is driven by advanced genomic sequencing techniques, better understanding of drug resistance mechanisms, and improved drug designs. The list of targetable molecular alteration is continuously expanding, and next generation molecular therapies have shown promise in circumventing drug resistance. Lung cancer patients may achieve durable disease control with immune checkpoint inhibitors however most patients develop immunotherapy resistance. A wide spectrum of resistance mechanisms, ranging from impaired T-cell activation, presence of coinhibitory immune checkpoints, to immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment, have been proposed. A multitude of novel immunotherapy strategies are under development to target such resistance mechanisms. This review aims to provide a succinct overview in the latest development in targeted therapy and immunotherapy for NSCLC management. Methods: We searched all original papers and reviews on targeted therapy and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using PubMed in June 2022. Search terms included "non-small cell lung cancer", "targeted therapy", "immunotherapy", "EGFR", "ALK", "ROS1", "BRAF V600E", "MET", "RET", "KRAS", "HER2", "ERBB2", "NRG1", "immune checkpoint", "PD-1", "PD-L1", "CTLA4", "TIGIT", "VEGF", "cancer vaccine", "cellular therapy", "tumour microenvironment", "cytokine", and "gut microbiota". Key Content and Findings: We first discuss the incorporation of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in early staged NSCLC. This includes the latest clinical data that led to the approval of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, adjuvant immunotherapy and adjuvant targeted therapy for early staged NSCLC. The second section focuses on targeted therapy in metastatic NSCLC. The list of targetable alteration now includes but is not limited to EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF V600E, MET exon 14 skipping, RET, KRAS G12C, HER2 and NRG1. Potential drug resistance mechanisms and novel therapeutics under development are also discussed. The third section on immunotherapy in metastatic NSCLC, covers immunotherapy that are currently approved [anti-PD-(L)1 and anti-CTLA4], and agents that are under active research (e.g., anti-TIGIT, cancer vaccine, cellular therapy, cytokine and other TME modulating agents). Conclusions: This review encompasses the latest updates in targeted therapy and immunotherapy in lung cancer management and discusses the future direction in the field.

Adjuvant Treatments for Surgically Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Mutations: A Review.

Importance: The use of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB-IIIA resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has limited benefit for improving cure rates. The proportion of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations among patients with resected NSCLC is comparable to that observed in patients with advanced disease, and the use of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been demonstrated to prolong disease-free survival (DFS). With recent approval of osimertinib in this context, a focus on the rapidly evolving scenario and future perspective in clinical practice is needed and was the aim of the current review. Observations: Randomized phase 3 clinical trials demonstrated DFS benefit with adjuvant EGFR TKI therapy in patients with resected EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. The most recent trial (ADAURA) assessed 3-year adjuvant osimertinib and showed consistent DFS benefit and a significant role of the intervention in preventing the occurrence of brain metastasis. However, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy, the appropriate duration of treatment, the management of disease relapse, and the effective cure rate remain undetermined. A deeper investigation on molecular biomarkers, covariant patterns, and dynamic monitoring of postsurgical circulating DNA would be helpful for the implementation of future strategies to further improve survival rates after adjuvant therapy for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Conclusions and Relevance: Adjuvant osimertinib revolutionized the treatment algorithm for patients with stage IB-IIIA resected EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Further evidence driven by clinical issues will be key for further optimization of the goals of adjuvant treatment in these patients.

Selenite as a dual apoptotic and ferroptotic agent synergizes with EGFR and KRAS inhibitors with epigenetic interference.

BACKGROUND: Selenium, an essential trace element, has previously been investigated as a pro-apoptotic and DNA demethylation agent. It sensitizes the response to chemotherapy in patients who were refractory to cytotoxic agents. Meanwhile, ferroptosis is a novel approach to cancer treatment by triggering cell death and reversing drug resistance. The role of selenium in treating cancer cells harboring druggable oncogenic alterations and its underlying mechanism are largely unknown. RESULTS: We treated lung adenocarcinoma cell lines-EGFR-mutant H1975 (H1975 EGFR p.L858R and p.T790M) and KRAS-mutant H358 (H358 KRAS p.G12C), with sodium selenite to examine its effect on cell apoptosis, ferroptosis, and DNA methylation, as well as its interaction with existing targeted therapy, osimertinib, and adagrasib. We observed selenite to be a dual apoptotic and ferroptotic agent on lung cancer cells, associated with the activation of p38-ATF4-DDIT3 axis in the unfolded protein response. Ferroptosis induction was more remarkable in H1975 than H358. Selenite also altered cellular DNA methylation machinery through downregulating DNMT1 and upregulating TET1, though not as a major mechanism of its activity. Low-dose selenite synergized with osimertinib in EGFR-mutant H1975, and with adagrasib in KRAS-mutant H358, with stronger synergism observed in H1975. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that selenite is a potential apoptotic and ferroptotic drug candidate for the treatment of especially EGFR- and potentially KRAS-mutant lung cancer.

Transbronchial Techniques for Lung Cancer Treatment: Where Are We Now?

The demand for parenchyma-sparing local therapies for lung cancer is rising owing to an increasing incidence of multifocal lung cancers and patients who are unfit for surgery. With the latest evidence of the efficacy of lung cancer screening, more premalignant or early-stage lung cancers are being discovered and the paradigm has shifted from treatment to prevention. Transbronchial therapy is an important armamentarium in the local treatment of lung cancers, with microwave ablation being the most promising based on early to midterm results. Adjuncts to improve transbronchial ablation efficiency and accuracy include mobile C-arm platforms, software to correct for the CT-to-body divergence, metal-containing nanoparticles, and robotic bronchoscopy. Other forms of energy including steam vapor therapy and pulse electric field are under intensive investigation.

Association of Immune-Related Adverse Events With Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Pooled Analyses of the Phase 3 IMpower130, IMpower132, and IMpower150 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Importance: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) arising from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) cancer therapy may potentially predict improved outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the association between irAEs and atezolizumab efficacy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using pooled data from 3 phase 3 ICI studies. Design, Setting, and Participants: IMpower130, IMpower132, and IMpower150 were phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemoimmunotherapy combinations involving atezolizumab. Participants were chemotherapy-naive adults with stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC. These post hoc analyses were conducted during February 2022. Interventions: Eligible patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive atezolizumab with carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel, or chemotherapy alone (IMpower130); 1:1 to receive atezolizumab with carboplatin or cisplatin plus pemetrexed, or chemotherapy alone (IMpower132); and 1:1:1 to receive atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel, atezolizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel, or bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (IMpower150). Main Outcomes and Measures: Pooled data from IMpower130 (cutoff: March 15, 2018), IMpower132 (cutoff: May 22, 2018), and IMpower150 (cutoff: September 13, 2019) were analyzed by treatment (atezolizumab-containing vs control), irAE status (with vs without), and highest irAE grade (1-2 vs 3-5). To account for immortal bias, a time-dependent Cox model and landmark analyses of irAE occurrence at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months from baseline were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS). Results: Of 2503 randomized patients, 1577 were in the atezolizumab-containing arm and 926 were in the control arm. The mean (SD) age of patients was 63.1 (9.4) years and 63.0 (9.3) years, and 950 (60.2%) and 569 (61.4%) were male, respectively, in the atezolizumab arm and the control arm. Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between patients with irAEs (atezolizumab, n = 753; control, n = 289) and without (atezolizumab, n = 824; control, n = 637). In the atezolizumab arm, OS HRs (95% CI) in patients with grade 1 to 2 irAEs and grade 3 to 5 irAEs (each vs those without irAEs) in the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month subgroups were 0.78 (0.65-0.94) and 1.25 (0.90-1.72), 0.74 (0.63-0.87) and 1.23 (0.93-1.64), 0.77 (0.65-0.90) and 1.1 (0.81-1.42), and 0.72 (0.59-0.89) and 0.87 (0.61-1.25), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In this pooled analysis of 3 randomized clinical trials, longer OS was observed in patients with vs without mild to moderate irAEs in both arms and across landmarks. These findings further support the use of first-line atezolizumab-containing regimens for advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02367781, NCT02657434, and NCT02366143.

Efficacy and safety of first-line lorlatinib versus crizotinib in patients with advanced, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated analysis of data from the phase 3, randomised, open-label CROWN study.

BACKGROUND: After a median follow-up of 18·3 months, the third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, lorlatinib, improved progression-free survival in patients with treatment-naive, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in the phase 3 CROWN study. Here we report updated efficacy data, including intracranial activity, from an unplanned analysis after 3 years of follow-up. METHODS: CROWN is an ongoing, international, randomised, open-label phase 3 trial done in 104 centres in 23 countries worldwide. Eligible participants were aged 18 years and older or aged 20 years and older (depending on local regulations) with advanced, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, had received no previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease, had at least one extracranial measurable target lesion (according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours [RECIST], version 1.1), and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to oral lorlatinib 100 mg daily or oral crizotinib 250 mg twice daily in 28-day cycles. Randomisation was stratified by the presence or absence of brain metastasis, and by ethnicity. Since the primary endpoint of the study had been met at the planned interim analysis, no further formal analysis of progression-free survival was planned, per protocol. The current unplanned analysis was done to further characterise tumour-related endpoints with a longer follow-up and is presented descriptively. For the planned study, the primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (investigator), objective response rate, intracranial objective response rate, time to intracranial progression, duration of response, intracranial duration of response, and safety. Efficacy endpoints were also assessed by the presence or absence of baseline brain metastases. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03052608. FINDINGS: Between May 11, 2017, and Feb 28, 2019, 425 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 296 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the lorlatinib (n=149) or crizotinib (n=147) group. At data cutoff for this unplanned analysis (Sept 20, 2021), median duration of follow-up for progression-free survival was 36·7 months (IQR 31·3-41·9) for lorlatinib and 29·3 months (10·8-35·0) for crizotinib. Median progression-free survival by blinded independent central review was not reached (95% CI not reached-not reached) for lorlatinib and was 9·3 months (7·6-11·1) for crizotinib (hazard ratio [HR] 0·27 [95% CI 0·18-0·39]). 3-year progression-free survival was 64% (95% CI 55-71) in the lorlatinib group and 19% (12-27) in the crizotinib group. Progression-free survival (investigator), objective response rate, intracranial objective response rate, time to intracranial progression, and duration of response were improved with lorlatinib versus crizotinib. In patients with baseline brain metastases (n=37 lorlatinib; n=39 crizotinib), the HR for time to intracranial progression for lorlatinib versus crizotinib was 0·10 (95% CI 0·04-0·27); in patients without baseline brain metastases (n=112 lorlatinib; n=108 crizotinib), the HR was 0·02 (95% CI 0·002-0·14). In patients without brain metastases, one (1%) in the lorlatinib group and 25 (23%) in the crizotinib group had intracranial progression. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 113 (76%) of 149 patients (most commonly due to altered lipid levels) with lorlatinib and in 81 (57%) of 142 patients with crizotinib. Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 11 (7%) patients in the lorlatinib group and 14 (10%) patients in the crizotinib group. There were no new safety signals. INTERPRETATION: These updated, long-term data from CROWN show the durable benefit of lorlatinib over crizotinib in patients with treatment-naive, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer and support the use of first-line lorlatinib in patients with and without baseline brain metastases. FUNDING: Pfizer.

Testing for EGFR Variants in Pleural and Pericardial Effusion Cell-Free DNA in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Importance: Molecular testing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is commonly limited by inadequate tumor sample. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) genotyping as a complementary test is specific but only moderately sensitive. Genotyping of cfDNA in pleural and pericardial effusion (PE-cfDNA) can further optimize molecular diagnostic yield and reduce the need for repeated biopsies. Objective: To prospectively validate droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) for detection of sensitizing EGFR variants and acquired Thr790Met variant (T790M) from PE-cfDNA in patients with NSCLC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective diagnostic validation study was conducted between September 6, 2016, and January 21, 2021 at 2 major Hong Kong cancer centers. Patients with advanced NSCLC with both wild-type and variant EGFR status and exudative PE who underwent thoracocentesis or pericardiocentesis were randomly enrolled. Patients were either EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) naive (cohort 1) or EGFR-TKI treated but osimertinib naive (cohort 2). Enrolled patients underwent pleural- or pericardial-fluid and blood sampling for ddPCR EGFR testing. EGFR status results with ddPCR testing of PE-cfDNA and blood were compared with EGFR status in matched tumor biopsy or PE cell block samples. Main Outcomes and Measures: Specificity, sensitivity, and concordance of PE-cfDNA for detection of sensitizing EGFR variants and acquired T790M variation. Results: Among 171 patients (54% female) enrolled, there were 104 in cohort 1 and 67 in cohort 2. In cohort 1, 37% (38/102) were EGFR-variant positive; PE-cfDNA showed 97% sensitivity (95% CI, 92%-100%), 97% specificity (95% CI, 93%-100%), and 97% concordance (ĸ = 0.94, P < .001) for the detection of sensitizing EGFR variants. It was more sensitive than plasma in detecting sensitizing EGFR variants (97% vs 74%, P < .001). In cohort 2, 38% (15 of 40) were positive for the EGFR T790M variant; PE-cfDNA showed 87% sensitivity (95% CI, 69%-100%), 60% specificity (95% CI, 41%-79%), and 70% concordance (ĸ = 0.42, P = .004) for acquired T790M. The EGFR T790M variant was detected in 51% of PE-cfDNA vs 25% of PE cell block samples. Conclusions and Relevance: In this diagnostic study, EGFR variants could be accurately detected from PE-cfDNA in patients with NSCLC. More EGFR T790M was detected in PE-cfDNA than in guideline-recommended PE cell block preparations. These results suggest that PE-cfDNA can complement plasma and tumor genotyping for detecting EGFR variants in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Five-Year Outcomes With Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Programmed Death Ligand-1 Tumor Proportion Score ≥ 1% in the KEYNOTE-042 Study.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.We report 5-year results from the phase III KEYNOTE-042 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02220894). Eligible patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without EGFR/ALK alterations and with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 1% received pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks for 35 cycles or chemotherapy (carboplatin + paclitaxel or pemetrexed) for 4-6 cycles with optional maintenance pemetrexed. Primary end points were overall survival (OS) in PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%, ≥ 20%, and ≥ 1% groups. Patients who completed 35 cycles of pembrolizumab with ≥ stable disease could begin second-course pembrolizumab upon progression. One thousand two hundred seventy-four patients were randomly assigned (pembrolizumab, n = 637; chemotherapy, n = 637). Median follow-up time was 61.1 (range, 50.0-76.3) months. OS outcomes favored pembrolizumab (v chemotherapy) regardless of PD-L1 TPS (hazard ratio [95% CI] for TPS ≥ 50%, 0.68 [0.57 to 0.81]; TPS ≥ 20%, 0.75 [0.64 to 0.87]; TPS ≥ 1%, 0.79 [0.70 to 0.89]), with estimated 5-year OS rates with pembrolizumab of 21.9%, 19.4%, and 16.6%, respectively. No new toxicities were identified. Objective response rate was 84.3% among 102 patients who completed 35 cycles of pembrolizumab and 15.2% among 33 patients who received second-course pembrolizumab. First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy continued to show durable clinical benefit versus chemotherapy after 5 years of follow-up in PD-L1-positive, locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC without EGFR/ALK alterations and remains a standard of care.

Brief Report: Exploratory Analysis of Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC Treated First Line With Atezolizumab Plus Carboplatin and Etoposide.

INTRODUCTION: In the phase 1/3 IMpower133 study, atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide (CP/ET) followed by maintenance atezolizumab for first-line treatment of extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) led to improvement in both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo plus CP/ET followed by maintenance placebo. We explored the benefit of atezolizumab versus placebo in the subset of patients who reached the IMpower133 maintenance phase and the safety profile of maintenance therapy. METHODS: Patients with untreated ES-SCLC were randomized 1:1 to four 21-day cycles of CP/ET with atezolizumab or placebo, followed by maintenance atezolizumab or placebo. The primary end points were OS and investigator-assessed PFS. A multivariate Cox model from the start of maintenance treatment was used to evaluate the treatment effect and account for lead-time bias; a generalized linear model was used to identify prognostic or predictive characteristics for reaching the maintenance phase. RESULTS: A similar proportion of patients in each arm received at least the first dose of maintenance therapy (atezolizumab: 77%, n = 154 of 201; placebo: 81%, n = 164 of 202) and were included in the maintenance analysis population. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 and absence of liver metastases at baseline were identified as prognostic factors for reaching the maintenance phase. The positive treatment effect with atezolizumab remained after adjusting for baseline characteristics. Median OS and PFS from the start of maintenance therapy in the atezolizumab versus placebo arm were 12.5 versus 8.4 months (hazard ratio = 0.59, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.80) and 2.6 versus 1.8 months (hazard ratio = 0.63 [95% confidence interval: 0.49-0.80]), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events from the start of maintenance therapy occurred in 41% (n = 64 of 155) and 25% (n = 41 of 163) of safety-evaluable patients in the atezolizumab and placebo arms, respectively, and were grade 3 or 4 in 28% (n = 43 of 155) and 23% (n = 37 of 163) of the respective populations; no patient in the atezolizumab arm and one patient in the placebo arm had a grade 5 treatment-related adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: These data in the context of other immunotherapy trials in ES-SCLC suggest that induction with atezolizumab plus CP/ET and maintenance treatment with atezolizumab are important components that contributed to the OS benefit observed in IMpower133. Safety results from randomization and from the start of maintenance therapy were similar between the treatment arms despite the continuation of atezolizumab in the maintenance phase.

Local ablative radiotherapy on oligo-progression while continued on epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: A longer cohort.

BACKGROUND: The effect of adding local ablative radiotherapy on oligo-progression while continuing EGFR-TKIs in advanced non-small cell Lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is to be determined. METHODS: Outcomes of patients with stage IV NSCLC harboring EGFR-activating mutations having ≤5 sites of oligo-progression while on EGFR-TKIs and given one to eight fractions of local ablative radiotherapy (LAR) were reviewed from 2012 to 2019. The time of starting first-line EGFR-TKIs to LAR is defined as progression-free survival 1 (PFS1; > one line of prior treatment allowed). The primary endpoint was PFS from LAR to further progression that led to stop of EGFR-TKIs (PFS2). The secondary endpoint was overall survival from LAR (OS). Factors affecting PFS2 and OS were analyzed with Cox regression. RESULTS: There were total 55 eligible patients. The median follow-up time was 13.3 months. Majority (89%) had sensitive mutations (exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R mutation). Total number of lesions treated were 75, including lung (n = 45), bone (n = 15), cervical lymph node (n = 1), adrenal (n = 1), and brain (n = 13). The median PFS2 was 6.9 months. The median OS was 25.1 months. On multivariable analysis, it was found that EGFR mutation type (exon 19 deletion / exon 21 L858R mutation vs. other rarer mutations), time from diagnosis to LAR within 70 days, and fewer lines of prior TKIs (1 or 2 vs. 3) had favorable effect on PFS2 (p = 0.006/0.00003; 0.046; 0.001/0.005, respectively). CONCLUSION: LAR is a noninvasive and effective modality in treatment of oligo-progressive diseases for patients with EGFR mutations positive NSCLC while on EGFR-TKIs.

IMpower150 Final Exploratory Analyses for Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in Key NSCLC Patient Subgroups With EGFR Mutations or Metastases in the Liver or Brain.

INTRODUCTION: Final overall survival (OS) analyses are presented for EGFR mutations and liver or brain metastases subgroups in the phase 3 IMpower150 study (NCT02366143) evaluating atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (ABCP) or atezolizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (ACP) versus bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (BCP). METHODS: Overall, 1202 patients (intention-to-treat population) with chemotherapy-naive, metastatic, nonsquamous NSCLC were randomized to ABCP, ACP, or BCP. Patients with treated, stable brain metastases were permitted. OS was evaluated in EGFR mutations and baseline liver metastases subgroups; rate and time to development of new brain metastases were evaluated in the intention-to-treat patients. RESULTS: At data cutoff (September 13, 2019; median follow-up, 39.3 mo), OS improvements were sustained with ABCP versus BCP in sensitizing EGFR mutations (all: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-1.14; previous tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]: HR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.38-1.46) and baseline liver metastases (HR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.45-1.02) subgroups. ACP did not have survival benefit versus BCP in sensitizing EGFR mutations (all: HR = 1.0; 95% CI: 0.57-1.74; previous TKI: HR = 1.22; 95% CI: 0.68-2.22) or liver metastases (HR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.68-1.51) subgroups. Overall, 100 patients (8.3%) developed new brain metastases. Although not formally evaluated, an improvement toward delayed time to development was found with ABCP versus BCP (HR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.39-1.19). CONCLUSIONS: This final exploratory analysis revealed OS benefits for ABCP versus BCP in patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations, including those with previous TKI failures, and with liver metastases, although these results should be interpreted with caution. The impact of ABCP on delaying the development of new brain lesions requires further investigation.

Incorporating circulating tumor DNA detection to radiographic assessment for treatment response in advanced EGFR-mutant lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) has limitations but remains the conventional approach for tumor assessments. We explored whether circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be incorporated into RECIST to provide a more robust measure of tumor response in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In FASTACT-2, patients with advanced NSCLC received platinum/gemcitabine intercalated with erlotinib or placebo. EGFR mutation (tumor and plasma ctDNA) was detected using cobas v2. Patients selected for this hypothesis-generating analysis had EGFR mutations (on either tumor or plasma) at baseline and evaluable week 8 plasma EGFR. Week 8 ctDNA and radiologic response status were correlated with survival using landmark cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Of the original 451 patients, 86 (19.1%) were eligible for this analysis. 73% (n = 63) had detectable ctDNA at baseline. At week 8, 40% (n = 34) had radiologic partial response (PR), 60% (n = 52) had stable disease (SD); 80% (n = 69) had a ctDNA response (undetectable ctDNA). In patients who had initial PR and undetectable ctDNA, 93% (28/30) had ongoing PR subsequently at week 16. The median duration of response was 14.9 months. In patients with SD and undetectable ctDNA at week 8, 28% had radiological PR at week 16. Amongst those with PR at week 8, survival outcomes for those with undetectable vs detectable ctDNA were not statistically significant (PFS HR 0.49, 95%CI 0.16-1.48, p = 0.21; OS HR 0.39, 95%CI 0.13-1.19, p = 0.10). Amongst those with SD at week 8, there was significantly longer survival for those with undetectable vs detectable ctDNA (PFS HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.13-0.57, p < 0.0001; OS HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.80, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: In patients with SD, undetectable ctDNA at week 8 correlated with survival improvement. Both radiologic and ctDNA responses are prognostic of PFS. Incorporation of ctDNA with RECIST may improve tumor response assessment in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Efficacy and Safety of S-1 Compared With Docetaxel in Elderly Patients With Advanced NSCLC Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Subgroup Analysis of the EAST-LC Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Despite recent advances in NSCLC treatment, specific data on the elderly population remain limited. In this post hoc subgroup analysis of the East Asia S-1 Trial in Lung Cancer (EAST-LC) trial, we compared S-1 and docetaxel (DTX) in patients aged 70 years old and above with pretreated advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive S-1 (orally, twice daily on d 1-28 of a 6-wk cycle) or DTX (intravenously, on d 1 of a 3-wk cycle). The initial S-1 dose was 80, 100, or 120 mg/day on the basis of body surface area, and the DTX doses were 60 mg/m2 (Japan) or 75 mg/m2 (outside Japan). The primary end point was overall survival, and secondary end points included progression-free survival, response rate, quality of life (QOL) using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30, and safety. RESULTS: Among 189 patients aged 70 years and above assessed as the full analysis set, baseline characteristics were generally similar between treatment arms. The median overall survival was 14.7 (S-1) versus 12.1 months (DTX); the hazard ratio was equal to 0.76, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.54-1.07. The median progression-free survival was similar in both arms (both 4.1 mo, hazard ratio = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.60-1.18); and the response rate was 12.9% (S-1) and 14.0% (DTX). The adjusted mean QOL score difference (S-1-DTX until wk 48) was 7.41 (95% CI: 0.37-14.46). Safety profiles were generally consistent with those of the overall EAST-LC population. CONCLUSIONS: S-1 revealed comparable efficacy, safety, and QOL versus DTX in pretreated elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. Results were consistent with the overall EAST-LC data.